Common Sense Americanism Logo
Think you know your stuff about The Constitution?  Click to find out!
Need quick info on Chief Justices of the Supreme Court?  "Know Your Stuff" contains lists of fast facts!
Read what the Supreme Court thinks about School Prayer in Abingdon School District v. Schempp

Site Links

• The Foundations
     of Americanism

• Historic Document
     Library

     • The Declaration of
        Independence

     • The U.S. Constitution
     • The Bill of Rights
     • The Amendments
• Supreme Court Cases
• Today In History
Article Archives --
     • Editorials
     • Opinion
     • In-Depth
     • Headlines
     • Court Challenges

• About Us

Site Search

Go
     Search Tips

Read or Post Mail
by Topic


Home Page
Earmark This Bad Argument
Click to join our News & Views e-mail alert
Know Your Stuff?

Fact lists about ...
U.S. Presidents
States & Territories
States Ranked
U.S. Chief Justices
U.S. Wars & Conflicts
Fed'l Debt & Spending
114th Congress

Flash Stats on ...
Congress
The Supreme Court
Tax Freedom Day

Take our
Americana Quiz
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
The Rule of Law Goes to Pot - Erick Erickson
Whether or not to enforce the law is not an executive option.

Why We've Let Actors Become Our Moral Guides - Jonah Goldberg
It's unfathomable why we allow ourselves to look up to Hollywood.


Headlines
Today in History:  Desert Storm Begins! (1991) ... Ivan the Terrible Crowned Czar (1547) ... U.S. Civil Service Established (1883) ... Prohibition Takes Effect (1920) ... Eisenhower Takes Command Of SHAEF (1944)

     ... More Headlines

Opinion
The Virtue-Signaling Anti-Virtue Crowd - Ben Shapiro
America knows posturing when it sees it. Actors doing what actors do.

Celebrate Freedom, Not Pot - Froma Harrop
Pot is just another risky intoxicant, like alcohol, to be used with care.

Don't Refill the Swamp by Restoring Earmarks, President Trump - Philip Wegmann
What a way to alienate the base and encourage bad behavior.

Happy Times and Starry Dreams in Tinsel Town - Wesley Pruden
Ah, the Hollywood primary. And the results are (yawn) unanimous.

Who Are You Calling a Moron? - Stephen Moore
If Trump is an idiot, what are the liberal elites he keeps outsmarting?

Usurping the President's Constitutional Authority - James A. Lyons
The courts tread on the C-in-C's authority; DOJ surrenders too easily.

America Needs a Balanced-Budget Amendment More Than Ever - George Will
Our current censensus: Taxation without representation of the unborn.

Bureaucrats Earn How Much? - Lewis Morris
The average worker in 78 federal agencies makes about $100,000 per year.

Dangers of Government Control - Walter Williams
Seven unelected people have life-and-death control over our economy.

     ... More Op-Ed



Earmark This Bad Argument —  With President Trump endorsing a return to earmarks, House Republicans too are reportedly "reconsidering" their usefulness and pondering "how they might ease back into the practice." Lawmakers fret that they have lost too much power by giving up this instrument of corruption. (Not their characterization.)

Wikipedia defines "earmark" as a budgetary provision that "directs funds to a specific recipient while circumventing the merit-based or [competitive] allocation process." An earmark is a taxpayer-funded goodie bestowed on a congressman's constituent, the sort of crony willing to contribute to the bestower's next election campaign in return.

Quid pro quo, pay-for-play, bribery. Whatever you call it, there's darn good reason why political leaders who fight corruption have fought to end earmarks.

Congressional Republicans imposed a ban on earmarks in 2011 to show that they were anti-corruption. So why relapse? Well, "the time is right," according to GOP Representative John Culberson, for Congress to prove it can use earmarks responsibly. His bad argument is that the "excesses" of a decade ago were committed by "knuckleheads [who] went overboard."

Somebody alert Culberson to the fact that many of the same knuckleheads are still in office. Ahem. Congress is not yet term-limited, remember?

The more basic point is that earmarks are by nature corrosive of sound government. President Trump's only metric is apparently "getting [things] done" as opposed to obstructionism, preferring "the great friendliness" when we had earmarks. Sure, stuff got done -- a lot more spending, a lot more bad stuff.

To the extent they're gone, earmarks should stay gone. The only appropriate action is to make it even harder to bring them back.

Paul Jacob, thisiscommonsense.com
Post Comment on Public Ethics ... or Read Comments
Click here to go to our Visitor Mail Archives Visitor Posts (latest first)
PKT - Liberate Government Workers ...  TM - Landrieu's Myth ...  TM - Hillary Clinton Supporters ...  PKT - Nationalism and Populism ...  TM - The Mizzou Meltdown ...  TM - The Second Indictment ...  PKT - America: Love It Or Leave ...  E.F - Munn v. Illinois ...  PKT - Is Thinking Now Obsolete? ...  PKT - Cops or Soldiers? ...  TM - The Great American Con ...  TM - The Imperial Presidency ...  R G McCollum - Document located in Gen ...  PKT - The Progressive Degradation ...  PKT - It's More Than Just ...  TM - Rescuing Citizenship ... 

Thomas Jefferson"... were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter." - Thomas Jefferson  (1/16/1787)



Copyright © 1999-2018 Common Sense Americanism - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy   Submitting Articles   Site Guide & Info
Home Page